Do not input private or sensitive data. View Qlik Privacy & Cookie Policy.
Skip to main content

Announcements
Join us in Bucharest on Sept 18th for Qlik's AI Reality Tour! Register Now
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
peterstalberg
Contributor III
Contributor III

Set analysis issue

Hi experts,

I'm stuck in a set analysis expression not giving me the expected result. Check out the table below, country Sweden and customer 'BB' & 'CC' are selected. Measures in column 3-5 gives me the expected result. For column 6 I want to show all sum(Sales) except for customers NOT selected under the selected country ('AA' & 'DD'). Any help on how to phrase this set expression would be highly appreciated. RGDS//Peter

peterstalberg_0-1676361835786.png

 

Labels (2)
1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
tresesco
MVP
MVP

Well, if you are looking for something like below:

tresesco_1-1676438546225.png

 

Sum({1<Customer=e({<Customer,Country=$::Country>}Customer)>+<Customer=p(Customer)>}Sales)

Possibly the expression can be simplified, you can give a try.

View solution in original post

4 Replies
tresesco
MVP
MVP

Your first three measures look to be equivalent to simple  -   Sum(Sales). While for the last one, you could try like:

Sum({1<Customer=e(Customer)>}Sales)

peterstalberg
Contributor III
Contributor III
Author

Hi Tresesco,

Thank you very much for your response. Unfortunately, this expression excludes customer 'BB' & 'CC'. AS described previously, I want to exclude 'AA' & 'DD' which has not be selected under Sweden an then include everything else. I have attached the qvf for clarity. Appreciate any further input. Regards//Peter

Note: Sweden, 'BB' & 'CC' are selected in the table.

 

peterstalberg_0-1676391911536.png

 

tresesco
MVP
MVP

Well, if you are looking for something like below:

tresesco_1-1676438546225.png

 

Sum({1<Customer=e({<Customer,Country=$::Country>}Customer)>+<Customer=p(Customer)>}Sales)

Possibly the expression can be simplified, you can give a try.

peterstalberg
Contributor III
Contributor III
Author

Hi Tresesco,

Spot on - thank you very much😀 Not sure if I can simplify your suggestion but I'll try to change the other measures using  e & p switches rather than the "getfieldselections" approach. RGDS//Peter