Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
EDIT 2 :
Ah, i just didn't read enough about the function firstsortedvalue
"
If the word DISTINCT occurs before the function arguments, duplicates resulting from the evaluation of the function arguments are disregarded. |
I don't undestand what is the goal of the function without distinct so.
Because, in case, now, i will always put distinct for security in case of duplicates.
Hello,
i had the exact same problem that this person had :
https://community.qlik.com/t5/QlikView-App-Dev/First-Sorted-Value-returning-NULL/td-p/1035637
I had this kind of field :
FirstSortedValue([ registration number],-[Date]) as [Identification].
It works for majority of the data but for some of cases, the firstsortedvalue return a null value ( but it is very weird that it returns nulls because for those problematic cases i have only one registrationNumber [ there are no duplicates for the ones who returns null, so it should return just the only one ] But, it returns null.
Then, thanks to the response on the post, i have put distinct and it works perfectly.
But i don't understand because there is only one element , no duplicates so why it doesn't even return the only one ?
If it is not a known problem i will insert as attachment a simplificate version of the qlik if someone can help, because i really don't understand why...
Also, is it better to always put distinct when it is useful to use firstsorterdvalue ?
thanks for reading,
have a nice day