It sounds like you're saying that there will be only a single value for transBASEPRICE for a given transDATE and for 200 Club Center? Then you could use only() to indicate this, but any of the 3 expressions above should work.
sum( {<capLEVEL={'200 Club Center'}>} transBASEPRICE) only({<capLEVEL={'200 Club Center'}>} transBASEPRICE) avg( {<capLEVEL={'200 Club Center'}>} transBASEPRICE)
I don't know what you want to do with the transBASEPRICE, so I can't give you an exact answer. I'm also unclear if you really only want them for 200 Club Center, or if that's not the real requirement at all.
Thanks for the response. What I would like the chart to show is the transBASEPRICE for 200 Club Center on the transDATE.
So, over time the chart would show the movement of the price based on the transDATE. Not sure if I want to sum the number, but hope that provides some clarity.
It sounds like you're saying that there will be only a single value for transBASEPRICE for a given transDATE and for 200 Club Center? Then you could use only() to indicate this, but any of the 3 expressions above should work.
That can and cannot be true. This data set consists of transactions. So on any transDATE, there can multiple transactions (transBASEPRICE) for the 200 Club Center, so in that line of thinking, I would think that sum would not work because if there are two transactions for 200 Club Center, say for $100 each, then the data point would be $200 for that particular transDATE.
Would something like this work as well??
=Max( {<capLEVEL={'200 Club Center'}>} transBASEPRICE)
Yes, the set expression should work with any aggregation function. If you want the maximum transBASEPRICE, then the expression you gave looks correct to me.
