Unlock a world of possibilities! Login now and discover the exclusive benefits awaiting you.
Hi,
this is an issue I don't know to solve:
I have a line chart where sometime I have value very hight:
So variations on the rest of the values cant be appreciated. On this scenario, a value over 10 is a "very hight value", and I don't care about the value.
To solve this I set the static max on the scale to 10, but get this result:
What I expected to get is a graph where the line goes out the upper limit. Something like this:
This way I can see the evolution of rest of values, and see there is a very hight value. As I said, I don't need to know the value of this value, only that it exists.
Anyone know how to solve it?
As a workaround, you may fill your linchart or use a plateau presentation of your line.
Consider that you want to show line chart for Sales by Customer
Dimension = Customer
Expression = SUM(Sales)
You can use below two expression under Axes >> Scale >> Static Min and Static Max
=Min(Aggr(SUM($(vSaleinEURO)),[Customer Name]))*1.1
=Max(Aggr(SUM($(vSaleinEURO)),[Customer Name]))*1.1
Hope this will help you
Hi, thanks for the reply, but this is not what I want do...
your solution fits the static max and min in the scale to the max and min values of the the sales...
what I want is set a static max that is lower than the max value, but if I do this, the graph shows wrong information: Graph 1 and graph 2 have the same data, but on graph 2 shows that "customer 7" has a sales of 10, when the real value is 500
btw, you should change the *1.1 in the min formula to *0.9 to avoid the same problem than me.
Can you upload your sample file or apps?
Here there is
As a workaround, you may fill your linchart or use a plateau presentation of your line.
Hi, thanks Sven
Fill the line chart solves the bug, but now I can´t add another line to the chart, because it adds the two values. The problem with the plateau is that the two lines overlaps and is not clear.
I think I will put two charts.