Skip to main content
Announcements
Qlik Connect 2025: 3 days of full immersion in data, analytics, and AI. May 13-15 | Orlando, FL: Learn More
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Not applicable

Help determining the subset of data that had never a certain value

Dear all,

We need to find, the “Set” of data that had never had a certain value.

Lets say we have the following input table listing the V_Values that F_Filed has assumed:

F_Field

V_Value

m1

A

m1

B

m2

A

m2

C

m3

B

m4

B

m5

B

Case1) If we want to list all F_Fields that had never got “A” value; the set would be only m2.

Case2) If we want to list the F_Fields that  never had a  “C”; the set would be m1,m3,m4,m5

The only way we fount to implement this  in Qv, was using a “dynamically built” set analysis. For instance, for the case “never been “A”, it would be:

concat({<F_Field-=$(='{'&concat(if(V_Value='A', F_Field),',')&'}') >} Distinct F_Field, ' ')

It can even be used into a calculated dimension:

aggr(concat({<F_Field-=$(='{'&concat(if(V_Value='a', F_Field),',')&'}') >} Distinct F_Field, ' '),F_Field)

As we  would expect, this approach worked  fine for a relatively low number of different F_Fields (lets say less than 6k different F_Filels), but our production DB has about 1.6 M distinct F_Fields and about 30M rows.

What can we do to achieve our buckets of data ?

Best regards,

Paulo

1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
Anonymous
Not applicable
Author

Paulo,

This expression look simpler, and works for you set of data (see attached):

=concat({1<F_Field=E(F_Field)>} distinct F_Field, '  ')

I don't expect it to have better performance, give it a try anyway. 

Regards,

Michael

View solution in original post

4 Replies
Anonymous
Not applicable
Author

Paulo,

This expression look simpler, and works for you set of data (see attached):

=concat({1<F_Field=E(F_Field)>} distinct F_Field, '  ')

I don't expect it to have better performance, give it a try anyway. 

Regards,

Michael

flipside
Partner - Specialist II
Partner - Specialist II

Hi Paulo,

Depending on the number of distinct V_Values you have, the attached may work where you turn the values into binary strings and parse the strings. Zeroes show where a value doesn't exist.

flipside

Not applicable
Author

I think is better to work with qvd .

Store your table into a qvd and create another qvd :

TAB_NEVER:

LOAD

F_Field,

if((sum(if(index(V_Value,  'A'   )<>0,1,0))>0,1,0) as FLAG_NEVERA,

if((sum(if(index(V_Value,  'B'   )<>0,1,0))>0,1,0) as FLAG_NEVERB,

if((sum(if(index(V_Value,  'C'   )<>0,1,0))>0,1,0) as FLAG_NEVERC,

if((sum(if(index(V_Value,  'D'   )<>0,1,0))>0,1,0) as FLAG_NEVERD

resident YOURTABLE

group by F_Field;

What is CapsLock change with your example.

hope it helps.

Not applicable
Author

Fantastic Michael. Worked like a charm!

It performs much better. I’ve used E()  so few times that had almost forgotten about it.

Just for the record, the statement  used to select the Set of F_Fields that had never assumed a specific V_Value was:

Concat({<F_Field=E({1< F_Field={'V_Value'} >} F_Field) >} Distinct F_Field,' ')

Best regards,

Paulo