Skip to main content
Announcements
Join us at Qlik Connect for 3 magical days of learning, networking,and inspiration! REGISTER TODAY and save!
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
marcel_olmo
Partner Ambassador
Partner Ambassador

Number IDs not linked properly. Challenge

Hi guys,

I have two tables : Table 1 and Table2.

Both tables have in common the same ID and the same value per that Id : 100100167766650000000.

But because of the lenght, in Qlikview the ID is showed as : 1,0010016776665e+020

It is supposed to be the same, but, if I load both tables they are not properly linked.

As you can see in the image below :

IDsprob.png

Anybody knows how to solve it? I've Attached the document if you want to take a look at it.

1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
marcel_olmo
Partner Ambassador
Partner Ambassador
Author

I got it from the elder post.

If you do this :

Div(%ID, 100000000)&Mod(%ID, 100000000)  as ID

You'll get your desired result.

Hope that helps to you as well if you find this in the future Swuehl,

Regards, Marcel.

View solution in original post

8 Replies
Clever_Anjos
Employee
Employee

Table1:

LOAD AutoNumber(%ID) as %ID,

    [%ID Table1],

    Date1,

    Date2

FROM

Table1.qvd

(qvd);

Table2:

LOAD AutoNumber(%ID) as %ID,

    [%ID Table2],

    Field1,

    Field2

FROM

Table2.qvd

(qvd);

swuehl
MVP
MVP

I think QV just can't handle this amount of number precision needed.

Either round your numbers to some smaller precision:

round(%ID / pow(10,7)) as %ID

or read your IDs in as text (you probably need to do this when reading from your source systems, before creating the QVDs).

marcel_olmo
Partner Ambassador
Partner Ambassador
Author

Thanks for the try Clever,

but I do that, it thinks that there are 8 different IDs, and the Id is always the same.

It is supposed to create a unique ID key.

AutoN.png

marcel_olmo
Partner Ambassador
Partner Ambassador
Author

Thanks swuehl you almost got it.

But the problem is that it is supposed to be always the same Id, but as you can see, the last one fails

AA1555.png

swuehl
MVP
MVP

The internal numeric representation seems to be different for your %ID values. Are you really 100% sure that these %ID values are identical in your source system?

Anyway, I think you should handle these when reading in from your source, not after QV might already messed up the values stored into the QVD.

marcel_olmo
Partner Ambassador
Partner Ambassador
Author

Yes Swuehl, I think you might be right.

I'm reading the following post talking about the same :

http://community.qlik.com/message/391464#391464

And yes, I'm completely sure in this case it's the same Id for all cases.

The problem is that I can't create the QVD because I have no access to the Database, I'm trying to solve that using only my QVDs.

Regards, Marcel.

marcel_olmo
Partner Ambassador
Partner Ambassador
Author

I got it from the elder post.

If you do this :

Div(%ID, 100000000)&Mod(%ID, 100000000)  as ID

You'll get your desired result.

Hope that helps to you as well if you find this in the future Swuehl,

Regards, Marcel.

swuehl
MVP
MVP

Seems like your losing the last significant digit doing so, i.e. the trailing digit '5'.